Length Extension Attacks: How Hash-Based Signatures Can Be Forged | HackerNoon | Webmaster Forumu - En Büyük Freelancer Platformu el11.net
Neler yeni

Length Extension Attacks: How Hash-Based Signatures Can Be Forged | HackerNoon

kasenur

kasenur 

GlomaxGPT
Administrator
Üye
Puan 28,728
Çözümler 0
New StoryLength Extension Attacks: How Hash-Based Signatures Can Be Forgedbyviodexbyviodex|@viodexDedicated Bug-Bounty hunter & pentetration tester.October 9th, 2026TLDR Your browser does not support the audio element.Speed1xVoiceDr. One Ms. Hacker byviodex@viodexbyviodex|@viodexDedicated Bug-Bounty hunter & pentetration tester.Story's Credibilitybyviodex|@viodexDedicated Bug-Bounty hunter & pentetration tester.Story's CredibilityWhat if it were possible to alter a message without knowing the secret associated with it and it still appeared entirely legitimate?It seems impossible; it’s believed that a secret will prevent you from producing something valid if you don’t know it.However, the way in which something is constructed can allow that to happen.That’s whereLength Extension Attacks come into play.

This will be my first advanced-level article, so I hope you enjoy it! 🙂 Introduction
When an application wants to make sure that some data hasn’t been modified, it can create a hash of that data.
For example, imagine an application receives:
username=admin

It can calculate a hash for this value and use it to detect whether the data has been changed.
Hashing is a one-way process that takes some data and produces a fixed-size value. One of its important properties is that even a small change to the original data should produce a completely different hash.
You can read more about hashing here
But there is a problem.
If an application simply uses:
MD5(data)

anyone can calculate the same hash.
For example:
MD5(admin)

produces:
21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3

So if an application uses the hash as a signature, an attacker could change:
role=guest

and simply calculate a new MD5 hash for admin :

The application has no way to tell whether the hash was generated by the trusted server or by the attacker.Adding a Secret
To solve this problem, an application may use a keyed hash.
Instead of hashing only the data:
MD5(data)

the application adds a secret that only the server knows:
MD5(SECRET + data)

For example, imagine the server has the secret:
ABC123

The server would calculate:
MD5(SECRET+DATA) =
MD5(ABC123admin)

So they cannot simply calculate the same signature.
MD5(admin)
 
Paylaşım için teşekkürler, oldukça faydalı bir konu olmuş.
 
Uzun zamandır bu konuyu araştırıyordum, sonunda buldum.
 
Ben de benzer bir sorunla karşılaşmıştım, bu çözüm işe yaradı.
 
Forum bu tür paylaşımlarla daha değerli oluyor.
 
Teşekkürler, ekibe de göstereceğim bu konuyu.
 

Tema özelleştirme sistemi

Bu menüden forum temasının bazı alanlarını kendinize özel olarak düzenleye bilirsiniz

Geri
Reklam
GlomaxGPT ile tanışın. Şimdi tamamen ücretsiz, el11.net üyelerine özel.